NLFit_Global_Fit.png' alt='Scientific Workplace Crack Free Download' title='Scientific Workplace Crack Free Download' />National Advocates for Pregnant Women Pregnancy and Drug Use The Facts.By combining drug war propaganda with claims of fetal rights, new and significant violations of civil liberties and human rights are occurring.In the last twenty years, hundreds of pregnant women and new mothers have been arrested, based on the argument that a pregnant womans drug use is a form of abuse or neglect.Scientific Workplace Crack Free Download' title='Scientific Workplace Crack Free Download' />In 1.South Carolina Supreme Court held that a pregnant woman who used cocaine and who gave birth to a healthy baby could be convicted of child abuse.More recently, a pregnant woman who used cocaine and suffered a stillbirth that was caused by an infection has been convicted of homicide by child abuse in South Carolina.More than eighteen states now address the issue of pregnant womens drug use in their civil child neglect laws, and a growing number of these states make it possible to remove a child based on nothing more than a single positive drug test.Like other applications of the war on drugs, the punishment of pregnant women targets vulnerable, low income women of colorthose with the least access to health care or legal defense.These cases represent a significant expansion of the war on drugs.To download Windows 8.F R O M T H E E D IT O R.Mariette DiChristina is editor in chief of Scientific American Follow her on Twitter mdichristina.Serious Benefits from Games Remember the.Moya K. Mason is a professional freelance researcher, book researcher, research consultant, fact checker, writer, editor, information scientist, and project manager.Pregnant women who are addicts can go to jail, despite Supreme Court rulings that treat addiction as a disease and punishment for it as a violation of the Constitutions prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.Similarly, despite the fact that people who are treated for drug related health problems are supposed to have extra protections under the federal drug treatment confidentiality statute, S.Its hard to wire a wind turbine while juggling a thick technical manual, or to ask offsite experts for help without being able to show them exactly what you see.C., by reinterpreting drug use as child abuse, creates a devastating exception to the statutes privacy protections.NAPW seeks to ensure that addiction and other health and welfare problems women face during pregnancy are addressed as health issues, not as crimes that families are not needlessly separated, based on medical misinformation and that pregnant and parenting women have access to a full range of reproductive health services, as well as non punitive drug treatment services.NAPW believes that without a comprehensive strategy to undo decades of misinformation and political posturing about pregnancy and drug use, an ever widening circle of women will be caught in increasingly punitive, intrusive, and coercive government controls that hurt rather than help women and their families.Similarly, drug policy reform efforts to de stigmatize drug users and to shift policies from punishment to treatment will fail if the myth of crack babies and crack mothers destroying a generation of children is left unchallenged.And, while failure to address the intersection of these issues could lead to further erosion of both drug policy reform efforts and reproductive rights, the ability to take on these issues in a coherent manner provides a unique opportunity to enlist the support of new organizations and communities in the struggle for drug policy reform, and a more just society.In this section you will find statements from leading scientists, medical researchers, medical, public health, and child welfare organizations addressing the issues of pregnancy and drug use.You will also find articles discussing why some women use drugs during pregnancy and how stigma and misinformation not only hurt pregnant women but also their children, families, and communities.December 0. 1, 2.In December 2. 01.Reuters released an investigative report, Helpless Hooked.It alleges that the failure of physicians and hospitals to consistently report women who used drugs while pregnant including those who used drugs prescribed by physicians and the failure of child welfare systems to intervene in such cases directly or indirectly contributed to the preventable deaths of 1.National Advocates for Pregnant Women NAPW recognizes that every infant death is a grave loss.We also recognize, however, how much harm has been done to American families in the name of protecting children.This Reuters series is the latest in a long line of journalistic reports that perpetrate stigma.Read full report.January 0. 7, 2. 01.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration SAMHSA Brochure, Methadone Treatment for Pregnant Women If youre pregnant and using drugs such as heroin or abusing opioid prescription pain killers, its important that you get help for yourself and your unborn baby.Methadone maintenance treatment can help you stop using those drugs.It is safe for the baby, keeps you free of withdrawal, and gives you a chance to take care of yourself.March 1. December 2.Download file. April 1.State v. Greywind, No.CR 9. 2 4. 47 N. D.Cass County Ct. Apr.On February 7, 1.Martina Greywind, a twenty eight year old homeless Native American woman from Fargo who was approximately twelve weeks pregnant, was arrested.She was charged with reckless endangerment based on the claim that by inhaling the vapors of paint fumes, she was creating a substantial risk of serious bodily injury or death to her unborn child.The complaint alleged The defendant willfully created a substantial risk of serious bodily injury or death to another, to wit.MARTINA GREYWIND, while pregnant intentionally inhaled the vapors of a volatile chemical in violation of North Dakota Century Code 1.On February 1. 0, 1.Ms. Greywind, without a lawyer, initially pleaded guilty.She was sentenced to nine months at a state prison farm and ordered to participate in a chemical dependency program.After an attorney took her case, however, Ms.Greywind was allowed to withdraw her plea on February 1.During this time, members of the Lambs of Christ were active in Fargo attempting to disrupt the Fargo Womens Health Clinic, the only abortion clinic in North Dakota.The Lambs of Christ is a loosely organized group of Roman Catholics who focus on the rescue of unborn children.They had been in North Dakota since March and members of their group had been repeatedly jailed.News stories about the case reported that members of the group who had been arrested attempted to befriend Ms.Greywind while they were in jail together.According to court records and the press, Lambs of Christ spokesperson Ronald Maxson posted 1.Ms. Greywind. Nine hours after her release on bail, Ms.Greywind was re arrested because police allegedly caught her sniffing paint again.She pleaded guilty to illegal inhalation of chemical vapors and was transferred to the state mental hospital.The States Attorney said Ms.Greywind was to spend thirty days in the hospital or jail as her sentence.On February 2. 0, 1.Lambs of Christ filed a petition seeking to have the womans brother, Ken Greywind, appointed her legal guardian, apparently in an effort to prevent Ms.Greywind from having an abortion.According to an affidavit filed by Mr.Greywind, I believe she is contemplating an abortion in order to have the charge of reckless endangerment dismissed and get out of jail so she can continue to abuse her body.The court denied Mr.Greywinds petition.On February 2. 1, 1.State and Ms. Greywind entered a stipulation an agreement between the parties that Ms.Greywind be released from the Cass County Jail for the following medical andor psychological appointment February 2.A. M. According to press reports, this release enabled Ms.Greywind to obtain an abortion at the Fargo Womens Health Clinic.Ms. Greywind obtained the abortion, despite widely publicized efforts by abortion opponents to persuade her to carry the pregnancy to term including a financial offer conveyed by the Lambs of Christ of at least 1.Ms. Greywind expressed a desire to have the abortion, but also her inability to pay the cost of the procedure.North Dakota law prohibited state funding of abortion.According to the press, anonymous donors offered to pay for the 3.On February 2. 4, 1.Mr. Maxson of the Lambs of Christ requested that the 1.The request was granted. Adobe Reader Todas Las Versiones Alternativas . On March 3. 0, 1.Ms. Greywind filed a motion to dismiss the charges arguing that the State in this case was seeking to criminalize the pregnancy of a drug addicted woman by applying a strained and unforeseen construction of the North Dakota reckless endangerment statute, as well as other grounds including the fact that the abortion rendered the case moot.Assistant Cass County Prosecutor Steve Dawson then filed a motion to dismiss with prejudice stating On February 1.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2017
Categories |